ISSN# 1545-4428 | Published date: 19 April, 2024
You must be logged in to view entire program, abstracts, and syllabi
At-A-Glance Session Detail
   
Multi-Center Reproducibility & Tools
Digital Poster
Analysis Methods
Tuesday, 07 May 2024
Exhibition Hall (Hall 403)
15:45 -  16:45
Session Number: D-180
No CME/CE Credit

Computer #
2999.
81Advanced Analytics Tools Guide Clinical MRI Protocol Optimization and Quantify Value
Sheena Y Chu1,2, Scott B Reeder1,2,3,4,5, and John W Garrett2
1Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 3Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 5Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States

Keywords: Data Processing, MR Value

Motivation: Quantifying clinical MRI utilization is essential to identifying opportunities to improve workflow and efficiency and contribute to better patient access and increased value.

Goal(s): We aim to demonstrate the benefits of analytics tools to measure utilization and guide protocol optimization.

Approach: An advanced analytics methodology was developed to identify workflow improvements and measure the impact of protocol interventions.

Results: We quantified the impact of three interventions: 1) MR enterography protocol modification, 2) focused protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, and 3) improved communication strategies for oblique image prescription for rectal cancer staging. All interventions were shown to improve MRI workflow and reduce exam time.

Impact: It is currently challenging to quantify the utilization of clinical MRI exams. Through the use of analytics tools to characterize MR exam utilization, opportunities for improvement can be identified. Such tools are essential to improve the value of MRI.

3000.
82Evaluate the effects of software on repeatability and reproducibility in brain volume measurements
Ruifeng Dong1, Amritha Nayak1,2,3, and Carlo Pierpaoli1
1Laboratory on Quantitative Medical Imaging, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States, 2Henry Jackson Foundation for Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States, 32) The Military Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (MTBI2), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States

Keywords: Segmentation, Segmentation

Motivation: MRI-based brain volumetry is a valuable  tool to assess human brain development and brain disorders. However, insuring repeatability and reproducibility is essential for a larger dissemination.

Goal(s): Our goal was to compare the repeatability/reproducibility in volume measurements by different popular software tools.

Approach: We performed T2w scans and repeated T1w scans for 82 subjects on two 3T scanners. We computed the volume within- and between-scanner variabilities.

Results: Improved masking helps reduce variability in Freesurfer’s volume measurements. Synthseg and vol2Brain give better volume repeatability/reproducibility compared to Freesurfer.

Impact: Our results provide quantification of the effects on repeatability/reproducibility from different software enabling clinicians and researchers to make an informed choice for data processing.
 

3001.
83QA/QC of the unprocessed anatomical, functional, and diffusion MRI data of the Human Connectome PHantom (HCPh) dataset with MRIQC
Céline Provins1 and Oscar Esteban1
1Dept. of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Keywords: Visualization, Neuroscience, QA/QC

Motivation: Reliable neuroimaging pipelines require the implementation of robust QA/QC protocols.

Goal(s): Demonstrating a comprehensive QA/QC checkpoint on ‘unprocessed’ data of a mid-size dataset with MRIQC.

Approach: We employ MRIQC in the visual assessment and training of automatic QC to identify data that must be excluded or flagged within the ‘Human Connectome PHantom’ (HCPh) project.

Results: We developed a QA/QC protocol for unprocessed data within the HCPh project with MRIQC, comprehensively describing predefined exclusion criteria. We then demonstrate the application of the protocol to the corresponding data and report the outcomes.

Impact: We demonstrate how to streamline QA in a neuroimaging workflow, establishing robust QA/QC protocols with MRIQC. This approach adds to the tooling available to improve neuroimaging analyses, ensuring more accurate and reproducible results.

3002.
84ComBat harmonization for multi-site fixel-based analysis using traveling subject dataset
Rui Zou1,2, Koji Kamagata2, Yuya Saito2, Christina Andica2,3, Wataru Uchida2, Kaito Takabayashi2, Sen Guo2, Seina Yoshida2,4, Rinako Iseki2,4, Takafumi Kitagawa1,2, Shohei Fujita2,5, Toshiaki Akashi2, Akihiko Wada2, Keigo Shimoji1,2,3, and Shigeki Aoki1,2,3
1Department of Data Science, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 2Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 3Faculty of Health Data Science, Juntendo University, Chiba, Japan, 4Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan, 5Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Keywords: Data Processing, Data Processing, Diffusion MRI, harmonization, fixel-based analysis, multisite

Motivation: Although multi-site DWI with large sample size has high statistical power and is sensitive to the subtle microstructural tissue changes, different models or protocols-induced measurement biases affect the reliability and reproducibility of the study. Therefore, harmonization is necessary to improve this issue.

Goal(s): The goal of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ComBat harmonization in mitigating measurement biases in FBA measures.

Approach: Our study utilized a traveling-subject DWI dataset, while various FBA measures were calculated and subsequently harmonized using the ComBat method.

Results: Our findings demonstrated that ComBat harmonization could effectively mitigate site, model, and protocol-induced measurement biases in FBA measures.

Impact: A significant contribution of this study is the seamless integration of ComBat into the fixel-based framework, which may enhance the reliability and reproducibility of multi-site research, offering a valuable tool for investigating microstructural tissue changes in the large-scale, multi-site studies.

3003.
85A new approach for reproducible water fraction and T1 mapping across different qMRI acquisition protocols
Eden Mama1, José P. Marques2, and Aviv A. Mezer3
1The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, 2Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Keywords: Data Processing, Brain

Motivation: The quantitative MRI community uses various acquisition approaches to extract the same quantitative maps while continuously working to find the agreement between them.

Goal(s): Our goal was to examine the agreement between the outcomes of two acquisition approaches, variable flip angle and MP2RAGE.

Approach: We produced a postprocessing method that generated qMRI maps from both acquisition approaches and controlled the similarities between the maps.

Results: Our new approach produced strong correlations between qMRI maps acquired with different sequences, emphasizing the agreement and consistency between them.

Impact: Our approach provides high agreement between different qMRI acquisition strategies, that may allow harmonization between different scanners and MR protocols and enable the usage of multiple datasets for research purposes.

3004.
86Spatial characterization of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) differences among multiple sites using a phantom
Jasmin Merhout1, Enedino Hernández-Torres1, Vanessa Wiggermann1, Finn Sellebjerg2,3, Jeppe Christensen4, Karam Sidaros1, Hartwig Siebner1,5, and Henrik Lundell1,6
1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Center for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital – Amager and Hvidovre, DRCMR, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center , Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Lyngby, Denmark

Keywords: Data Processing, Phantoms

Motivation: The motivation came to acknowledge the aid for sequence standardization and to assess other site-related differences.

Goal(s): We aim to consider the SNR differences to improve comparability between sites in structural analysis of brain data.

Approach: We describe preliminary MRI phantom data from a longitudinal, multi-site MS study, illustrating an approach to sequence standardization and assessing site-related differences.

Results: Scan-rescan data were collected on three 3T MRI systems, using study specific, previously optimized sequences. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured on a 16 x 16 grid structure within the phantom. Imaging voxels within the grid where algorithmically identified and SNR assessed in each cube.

Impact: Large between-site differences in SNR and spatial variability were observed, while longitudinal data showed good consistency in mean SNR and spatial appearance. These differences underscore the need for correction to improve between-site comparability.

3005.
87An extendable web-based tool for online radiological assessment of imaging protocols
Haroon R Chughtai1,2, Miguel Rosa-Grilo3, David L Thomas3,4, Bhavana S Solanky1,5, Millie Beament3, Daniel C Alexander6, Frederik Barkhoff3,7, Nick Fox3, Catherine J Mummery3, and Geoff JM Parker1,5,8
1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Advanced Research Computing (ARC) Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 3Dementia Research Centre (DRC), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 4Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 5NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 6Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 7Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8Bioxydyn Limited, Manchester, United Kingdom

Keywords: Software Tools, Software Tools

Motivation: Available online reading tools were not readily extendable for our comparative and inter-rater radiological assessment of an ultra-fast MRI protocol for dementia diagnosis.

Goal(s): We sought to develop a review tool  to enable scalable, geographically-distributed review of imaging protocols for diagnostic use.

Approach: We designed a web-based review tool and evaluated it for our needs, whilst ensuring flexibility for use across MRI studies.

Results: We developed the Extendable Review Tool using popular technologies to ease configuration for future studies.  We tested the tool using a dementia-specific questionnaire to compare ultra-fast and standard of care MRI scans across a range of contrasts.

Impact: Our Extendable Review Tool is customisable for any MRI-based study where geographically-distributed clinical reading of a set of images is needed. As an extendable and flexible web-based tool it has potential to aid a broad range of studies.

3006.
88Multi-site Scanner Characterisation for Global Ultra-low Field MR Imaging
Emil Ljungberg1,2, Francesco Padormo3, John Evans4, Petter Clemensson1, Shannon Kolind5, Samson Lecurieux Lafayette6, Carly Bennallick2, Layla E. Bradford7, Kirsten A. Donald7,8, Able Khosa9, Maclean Vokhiwa9, Talat Shama10, Michael S. Pepper11, Alexica De Canha11, Lydia Sekoli11, Jeanne Van Rensburg11, William J. Hollander12, Todor Karaulanov12, Steve Williams2, and Sean Deoni13
1Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 3Hyperfine Inc., Guilford, CT, United States, 4Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 5University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6Perinatal Imaging & Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 7Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 8The Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 9Training & Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), Zomba, Malawi, 10Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dahka, Bangladesh, 11Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 12CaliberMRI, Boulder, CO, United States, 13MNCH D&T, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, United States

Keywords: Phantoms, MR Value, Quality Assurance

Motivation: Combining data from multiple sites is necessary in order to reach large sample sizes. This can be challenging, especially with portable ultra-low field (ULF) systems where conditions can vary.

Goal(s): To characterise image quality across multiple sites using ULF-MRI for future data harmonization.

Approach: Acquisition of QA scans across sites with centralised analysis for cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment. SNR and T2w contrast were calculated

Results: SNR was consistent within site, but some variation between sites. Image contrast was consistent, but extra care should be taken with software updates.

Impact: Quality assurance is essential for portable ultra-low field MRI. Our results demonstrate that SNR and contrast are useful metrics for image quality characterisation. This paves the way for harmonization of in vivo data in global studies using ultra-low field MRI.

3007.
89Field Camera input to Virtual Phantom (ViP) scanner acquisitions for quality assurance of derived MRI quantities: First Proof-of-Principle.
Peter Gatehouse1, Andrew Scott1, Gaby Captur2, Muhammad Usman1, Ronald Mooiweer1, Dudley Pennell1, and Sonia Nielles-Vallespin1
1Cardiovascular MR, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 2University College London, London, United Kingdom

Keywords: Phantoms, New Devices, Precision & Accuracy, Field Camera, Virtual Phantom

Motivation: Quality assurance (QA) of quantities derived from MRI requires elaborate phantoms. Instead, we send modulated RF signals into the scanner representing any initial test object (previous “Virtual Phantom ViP”) avoiding physical phantom difficulties.

Goal(s): Proof-of-principle of a novel step for QA of derived quantities, by combining two previous methods: a Field Camera (FC) to govern ViP. 

Approach: QA compares outputs from the unmodified scanner against the initial object. Tests evaluated the prototype technically, plus a derived QA example: myocardial bloodflow by first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion.

Results: Phase stability without phase-locking to scanner was marginal, while first demonstrating FC+ViP QA of a derived quantity.

Impact: Quality assurance of derived quantities can require elaborate physical phantoms. Instead, we demonstrate novel field camera governance of the unmodified scanner's virtual phantom acquisition, reconstruction and analysis. We call for vendor cooperation in a new standardised inexpensive quality control interface.

3008.
90Comparing Myocardial Strain in Healthy Individuals of Different Ages: An Assessment of Two Vendor Software Tools
Ye tong Zhao1,2, Ying Liu1,2, Xiao lin Mu1, Yang Song1, Jing Zhu1,2, and Wen jia Wang3
1Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, 2Department of Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, 3GE HealthCare MR Research, Beijing, China

Keywords: Software Tools, Data Analysis, Data Processing, Software Tools, Heart

Motivation: There is no uniform standard for the value of myocardial strain of different software vendors.

Goal(s): The study utilizes cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking technique to assess the differences in myocardial strain parameters among healthy individuals of different age groups while employing two distinct vendor software tools. 

Approach: The study utilizes cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking technique to assess myocardial strain parameters while employing two distinct vendor software tools. 

Results: The findings indicate variations in strain parameters across healthy individuals of varing age groups based on measurements obtained from CVI42 and Medis. Significant disparities in certain parameters are observed between the two suppliers. 

Impact: The normal reference values of myocardial strain from different suppliers can not be unified, and large samples and multi-center studies are needed in the future.

3009.
91Challenges and recommendations for MRI protocol development in clinical practice: a UK based survey.
Matthew Grech-Sollars1,2, Holly Elbert3, and Maria Yanez Lopez4
1Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, 3Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom, 4Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, United Kingdom

Keywords: Data Acquisition, MR Value, Protocol development

Motivation: MR protocol development in a clinical setting is essential for running an optimal MRI service within Radiology. However, there is no clear path to implementation.

Goal(s): The purpose of this study was to understand the varied nature of MR protocol development within the clinical setting in the UK.

Approach: We conducted a survey on MR protocol development, and approached MR Physicists, Radiographers and Radiologists within the UK. 

Results: Results highlighted the current lack of resources, particularly scanner and staff time. Respondents also highlighted the importance of implementing processes, enabling communication and disseminating results.

Impact: Establishing good practice in MRI protocol development can lead to major improvements within the radiological workflow, including efficiency and image quality gains for higher quality diagnosis and increased patient throughput. 

3010.
92Image processing techniques used in satellite imaging can improve change detection on longitudinal MRI scans
Radhika Tibrewala1,2,3, Daniel K Sodickson1,2,3, Hersh Chandarana1,2, Giuseppe Ruello4, and Riccardo Lattanzi1,2,3
1Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 3Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 4Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy

Keywords: Visualization, Tumor

Motivation: Change mapping techniques used in satellite imaging could be used for visualizing changes in longitudinal MRI.

Goal(s): To generate change maps to highlight tumor margins in longitudinal MRI scans of patients with brain metastasis.

Approach: We used the NYUMets public dataset. We adapted the VALE method used in satellite imaging to generate change saliency maps for patients with small brain metastasis by performing spatial and intensity registration over longitudinal MRI data.

Results: The change mapping technique made small tumors visually obvious, enhanced visualization of change in tumors and edema over time, and showed tumor boundaries that were not visible on T1-post contrast images.

Impact: This work demonstrates that image processing techniques used in satellite imaging could be effectively used for tracking changes in longitudinal MRI. The proposed approach can lead to better treatment planning and patient progress monitoring due to its sensitivity to changes.

3011.
93RIMLA: Reproducibility-Informed Method for Longitudinal Assessment
Veronica Ravano1,2,3, Michaela Andelova4, Gian Franco Piredda1,5, Stefan Sommer1,6, Samuele Caneschi1, Lucia Roccaro1, Jan Krasenky7, Matej Kudrna7, Tomas Uher4, Ricardo A. Corredor-Jerez1,2,3, Jonathan A. Disselhorst1,2,3, Bénédicte Maréchal1,2,3, Tom Hilbert1,2,3, Jean-Philippe Thiran3, Jonas Richiardi2, Dana Horakova4, Manuela Vaneckova7, and Tobias Kober1,2,3
1Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthineers International AG, Lausanne, Geneva and Zurich, Switzerland, 2Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 3LTS5, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, 5CIBM Centre for Biomedical Imaging, Geneva, Switzerland, 6Swiss Centre for Musculoskeletal Imaging (SCMI), Balgrist Campus, Zurich, Switzerland, 7Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Keywords: Data Processing, Reproductive, longitudinal analyses; quantitative biomarkers

Motivation: Estimating longitudinal changes in imaging biomarkers is challenging due to the multiple sources of variation during acquisition that can influence the analysis of MRI data. 

Goal(s): To provide a robust estimate of longitudinal changes based on the comparison of cross-sectional imaging biomarkers from different time points.

Approach: We introduce RIMLA, a Reproducibility-Informed Method for Longitudinal Assessment that quantifies longitudinal imaging biomarker changes while accounting for the robustness of the underlying image processing algorithm. 

Results: As a first application, we show that RIMLA allows to identify multiple sclerosis lesion subtypes characterized by statistically significant enlargement or shrinkage over time. 

Impact: The here introduced Reproducibility-Informed Method for Longitudinal Assessment (RIMLA) allows to robustly detect small longitudinal changes in quantitative biomarkers. This increase in sensitivity can lead to better informed clinical decisions, for example during treatment monitoring or disease progression follow-ups.   

3012.
94Quality Assurance of Diffusion and Fat Imaging using System Phantoms: Reproducibility for Multivendor Neuromuscular Studies
Ping Wang1,2, Noah Frazier2,3, and Richard D Dortch1,2
1Translational Neuroscience, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States, 2Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States, 3University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States

Keywords: Phantoms, Neuro, Phantom, diffusion, fat imaging

Motivation: Our multi-site studies require quality assurance for diffusion and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) imaging across vendors.

Goal(s): To establish DWI and PDFF protocols and analysis tools to evaluate reproducibility and reliability.

Approach: DWI and PDFF protocols were conducted on two 3T MRI systems (Philips and GE) on a diffusion phantom and a PDFF phantom. The measured ADC and PDFF values were compared across the scanners and also compared with the phantom reference values. Correlation coefficient and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were reported.

Results: High reproducibility and high accuracy were achieved across the MRI vendors as indicated by the correlation coefficients and RMSE.

Impact: Our results showed that quality assurance can be well maintained between the two MRI scanners, both DWI and PDFF measured on the two scanners at our institute are reliable and accurate, this has important implications for our future multi-site studies.